E = in sta e in = i\/I n’ding es\/se tau(t) eya n”ding = I n’ding being taut I am n’ding

a’s E = mc2 or\/ro em c’ing 2 a’s that E potential\/potisesse a’s that I am able to be thinker thinking thought, simultaneous to being thought of as that, of that I am realizing that zing of real is aside of n a’s Z is N turned over to cleave, to divide n’ding from b’going 2 b’ginning.

I second that e-motion a’s meaningless concept a’s x-unknown cept’ing be(ing) tween\/twin 2 a’s point potential\/potisesse 2 e a(‘s) c’ing hay o\/ayin taut eya er\/re.

W X Y Z = Wx/ w/infinite potential unmanifest y/why zee at the end of alphabeta? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZNNNNNNNNNNN

Y Zee a’s the n’d????????zzzzzzzzz?????????ZZZZZZZZZ???????NNNNNNNNN

That clue is missing from that Greco-Roman form yet appears in the original 22 keys a’s key 17 Tz / tzaddi (Ts, Tz, Cz a’s Czar) a’s that fish-hook that draws that nun fish out of the mem ory water, that reflected, personal existence suspended in that question, that quest i on a’s feeling a’s some agency whereby I may investigate unseen, unknown, unmanifest in some attempt to solve enigma by following that faint trial.

Meditation tz function a’s tau that unbroken singularity a’s particular object of that subject seen a’s for instance that I am seeing this simultaneous w/ being that I am a’sleep……zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.

In that it seems that a’s in grammar, all objectivity is a case of that subject filling in all syntactical relations w/ that potential name for it, then as such that how much becomes a relative question.