is precisely that as it is after the fall is, is born out in realizing that the problem of appearing to disappear is purely literal(ly merely(mirror’ly)(me(m) re(y)), a syntax of word in phrase & sentence.  That grammar, that scientific study of the morphology of language reveals cases  wherein that nominative/subject is (y/you now/na – y na merely(mirror’ly) an y(any) thought of y/you ‘as’ falling into x’eting/anding/duplicating in(being be”am’ing) various objective cases as t(h)ings(assemblies asz though(tsz)) expressed in prepositions indicative of relationships to another substantive / noun / name, verb, or adjective; re: by, for, from, in, to, with, of.  That is not a real problem until, after years of apparent conditioning by constant use of language to communicate, that subject, that I am, seems to actually fall under a spell(ing) wherein objectivity rather than subjectivity is the case for reality. Reality of singularity of that subject, y/you/yod/iota that I am, y’all’sz actuality, remains even in that y potential to be objectified asz though(tsz) appearance//a pair’ance asz x is tense first person singular present that that I am is is.