What(Y) does it mean?

What(Y) does it have in mind(‘or y/mem or y) asz intent or purpose?

Why(Y), for what purpose, does it have in mind asz purpose?

Why(Y) purpose of purpose?

Y you’re you per pose of free freed freedom standing status state of being that being per pose of it asz objective of subject or subjective of object is same asz me or you in(being be”am’ing) any mere(mirror duplicity) y na you/yod/iota/that I am now not(y’ll d’na – denial – positive negation w/intent of intentional disregard) of being that being indivisible w/in appearing a pairing asz though(tsz) being w/out(x), being b”lack(ing) asz ka’s y’all(causal y) bodhi being to perceive to wish to think the or y of man’as mind’or y you’re you.

Is that what it does mean?

Is that why it performs asz though(tsz) in the or y of mind’or y(memory) w/intent of ignoring y you’re; being still(motionless immortal) indivisible individual now eve’n(a) y any mere(mirror duplicity) y na you now out(x) appearing a pairing asz  that objective of subject that I am is it or subjective of object it appears asz too(two) be?

“the effect (of it being the or y of man’as mind’or y asz mean or medium by which some(sum) end(any mere y na) is accomplished) is to throw the mind(‘or y) b(l)ack on itself, thus we (all/wheel turn asz too(two)) soon perceive that the sublime is not(na/y na/you now) to be looked for in(being be”am’ing) things of nature(na”t((h)at) u (a)re) but in(being be”am’ing) (h)our own ideas (asz though(tsz) it is appearing objectively)”                         .                                                                   . . .after Kant . . .principle of the sublime